DisMember writes
While Starmer choked out a valedictory PMQs, Burnham orchestrated a bloodless coup. Hunt’s old punching bag hasn’t just dodged the ropes; he’s bought the gym.
The historical echo
Jeremy Hunt
16 July 2013 · House of Commons
What they said
Hunt wields whistleblower testimonials like a parliamentary scalpel, dissecting Labour's legacy of 'poor care' and 'spin'.
"you made big mistakes Andy, it’s time you admitted it."
DisMember on 16 July 2026 — why this matters today
There is a bleak comedy in the arrogance of the dispatch box. In 2013, Jeremy Hunt leaned across the Commons and addressed the shadow health secretary with the pained, sorrowful condescension of a prep school headmaster. “You made big mistakes, Andy,” he sighed, “it’s time you admitted it.”
Fast forward thirteen years, and 'Andy' has bypassed the confession box altogether. While Keir Starmer choked out a valedictory PMQs following a brutal defenestration by his own MPs, Burnham orchestrated a bloodless coup. Dispensing with the tedious necessity of a general election or even a party membership contest, the Mayor of Greater Manchester has ridden a wave of union backing straight to the steps of Number 10.
One wonders if Burnham will finally take Hunt's advice about admitting mistakes. Frankly, he seems rather busy. Between ruling out immediate wealth taxes to soothe the City and aggressively anointing Shabana Mahmood as his chancellor over a purportedly 'risky' Ed Miliband, the incoming Prime Minister is writing the rules as he goes. Hunt’s old punching bag hasn’t just dodged the ropes; he’s bought the gym.
The contemporary echo
Jeremy Hunt's patronising 2013 dressing-down of Andy Burnham looks decidedly quaint now that his old target has bypassed the electorate to claim the keys to Number 10.
Explore Parliament yourself
Search sixteen years of Commons debate
Find the memorable moments, not just the keywords. Semantic search across 325,000+ enriched contributions.
Search Parliament →The sketch above is written by AI (Gemini) and reflects editorial interpretation, not verified fact. The source quote is verbatim from Hansard. Verify against the original Hansard record.